In one of the articles found on USA Today, "ObamaCare is fiscally irresponsible: Opposing view" Michael A. Needham takes a stand on Obama Care. Michael A. Needham, the author of this article, believes Obama Care to be "incompatible with fiscal responsibility." He uses a substantial amount of evidence to support this claim, but he lacks in his thoughts. He gives us his opinion based off facts; he doesn't really include how Obama Care affects his emotions. As an author taking a stand on an issue, it is his job to provide us with facts to support his claim, as well as some type of personal experience or emotion that he felt when dealing with this issue. That way the reader can trust his credibility because as the author he experienced the effect Obama Care has on the world. His article appears to a limited amount of people who feels as though Obama Care isn't helping our economy, it's hurting our economy. His article needs to appear to a wider range of people, it shouldn't appear to a certain group of people, but because of how the article is written, it only can appear to a certain crowd. If you want to make a claim that Obama Care isn't helping our economy, then you need to provide more information regarding that issue and ways to fix that issue. This will enable more people who may not agree with you to take a stand on this position because you've provided them with a solution to your problem. I don't necessarily agree with this article because I support Obama Care. I only support Obama Care because I like Obama and I believe that he is trying to make a change in the world, but given that opportunity to read something that's provides me with information on Obama Care and how it's helping/ hurting our economy, my opinion can easily change. So if Michael A. Needham wants to get through to people like me, who only support Obama Care because of the person involved within it, then they need to provide an argument that not only takes a stand on a topic, but it also expresses how that person feels about the topic and it provide us with a range of ways to fix that issue. Overall Michael A. Needham does a good job at stating his opinion on Obama Care and providing us with facts to support that claim, but he lacks in emotion and personal experiences as to why he doesn't support Obama Care. He could add some details regarding other people views on Obama Care verses his and some suggestions as to how he thinks we can fix or change the way Obama Care works.
Monday, September 30, 2013
A Reader's Critique on "ObamaCare is fiscally irresponsible: Opposing view"
In one of the articles found on USA Today, "ObamaCare is fiscally irresponsible: Opposing view" Michael A. Needham takes a stand on Obama Care. Michael A. Needham, the author of this article, believes Obama Care to be "incompatible with fiscal responsibility." He uses a substantial amount of evidence to support this claim, but he lacks in his thoughts. He gives us his opinion based off facts; he doesn't really include how Obama Care affects his emotions. As an author taking a stand on an issue, it is his job to provide us with facts to support his claim, as well as some type of personal experience or emotion that he felt when dealing with this issue. That way the reader can trust his credibility because as the author he experienced the effect Obama Care has on the world. His article appears to a limited amount of people who feels as though Obama Care isn't helping our economy, it's hurting our economy. His article needs to appear to a wider range of people, it shouldn't appear to a certain group of people, but because of how the article is written, it only can appear to a certain crowd. If you want to make a claim that Obama Care isn't helping our economy, then you need to provide more information regarding that issue and ways to fix that issue. This will enable more people who may not agree with you to take a stand on this position because you've provided them with a solution to your problem. I don't necessarily agree with this article because I support Obama Care. I only support Obama Care because I like Obama and I believe that he is trying to make a change in the world, but given that opportunity to read something that's provides me with information on Obama Care and how it's helping/ hurting our economy, my opinion can easily change. So if Michael A. Needham wants to get through to people like me, who only support Obama Care because of the person involved within it, then they need to provide an argument that not only takes a stand on a topic, but it also expresses how that person feels about the topic and it provide us with a range of ways to fix that issue. Overall Michael A. Needham does a good job at stating his opinion on Obama Care and providing us with facts to support that claim, but he lacks in emotion and personal experiences as to why he doesn't support Obama Care. He could add some details regarding other people views on Obama Care verses his and some suggestions as to how he thinks we can fix or change the way Obama Care works.
Thursday, September 19, 2013
"Washington Navy Yard opens just three days after massacre."
On Thursday, September 19, 2013, ABC News published an article titles "Washington Navy Yard opens just three days after massacre." This article explains how wokers were devastated to return to work just 3 days after the Washington Navy Guard shooting occured. We all should know about this shooting that occured on September 1, 2013 at the Washington Navy Guard, but for those who don't this is what happened. A 34-year-old, afican american man named Alexis gunned down 12 people before police killed him. He claimed to be unstable, as "he complained to police in Rhode Island that people were talking to him through the walls and ceilings of his hotel room and sending microwave vibrations into his body to deprive him of sleep." Today the workers at the Washington Navy Guard will be returning back to this place where this awful event took place. This aticle is important not only because it educates us on this event but it also explains how this man conisently was denied help by the govenment because he didn't meet its "needs". This man tried to tell the world that he wasn't mentally stable but they didn't see nothing wrong with him. We as citizens blame people like Alexis for his actions because we only see what the media brodcasts, but there's way more details to the story then what they show us, which is why you should read this aricle. This article gives us the full details on this tradedy as well as the facts and it's also educating us on a real life issue that occured within our country. These people that work here will be reminded every day of this tradgey so why shouldn't we take at least 10 minutes to pay our respects to not only the people that work here, but also their families. Reading this article is an excellent way to pay our respects!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)